Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorBorowski, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorKazakov, Alexey
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T06:01:08Z
dc.date.available2023-08-08T06:01:08Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023-08-03T15:09:09Z
dc.identifierONIX_20230803_9791221501223_163
dc.identifier2612-7679
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/74967
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/112196
dc.description.abstractDeconstruction in the 19th Century (from the Natural School to Leo Tolstoy) and Fyodor Dostoevsky. The modern understanding of deconstruction arose from post-structuralism and implies distrust of semblance, the outward appearance of any ideology or structure, together with the search for a hidden interior. Dostoevsky renounces one-dimensionality and shows its deconstructing nature. He considers it a prejudice to believe that disclosing the hidden and forbidden has more “truth” in it, as is evident from his dispute with Tolstoy, who uses the principle of exposing the ignoble background of a supposedly noble national ideology to criticize the “defenders of the Slavic brothers” in Anna Karenina. Dostoevsky refuses to recognize the results of deconstruction (the denial of the declared) as the last and only version of the truth about reality. His approach can be defined as the “deconstruction of deconstruction.”
dc.languageRussian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiblioteca di Studi Slavistici
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherdeconstruction
dc.subject.otherDostoevsky and the Natural School
dc.subject.otherDostoevsky and Leo Tolstoy
dc.subject.otherspecificity of Dostoevsky’s realism
dc.subject.otherartistic model of truth
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies
dc.titleChapter Деконструктивные практики XIX века (от натуральной школы до Л.Н. Толстого) и Ф.М. Достоевский
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0122-3.05
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookФ.М. Достоевский: Юмор, парадоксальность, демонтаж
oapen.relation.isbn9791221501223
oapen.pages11
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber52
dc.abstractotherlanguageDeconstruction in the 19th Century (from the Natural School to Leo Tolstoy) and Fyodor Dostoevsky. The modern understanding of deconstruction arose from post-structuralism and implies distrust of semblance, the outward appearance of any ideology or structure, together with the search for a hidden interior. Dostoevsky renounces one-dimensionality and shows its deconstructing nature. He considers it a prejudice to believe that disclosing the hidden and forbidden has more “truth” in it, as is evident from his dispute with Tolstoy, who uses the principle of exposing the ignoble background of a supposedly noble national ideology to criticize the “defenders of the Slavic brothers” in Anna Karenina. Dostoevsky refuses to recognize the results of deconstruction (the denial of the declared) as the last and only version of the truth about reality. His approach can be defined as the “deconstruction of deconstruction.”


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access