Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorScholze, Lenka
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T04:02:20Z
dc.date.available2023-11-28T04:02:20Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023-11-27T17:12:54Z
dc.identifierONIX_20231127_9791221501841_23
dc.identifier2612-7679
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/85613
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/128172
dc.description.abstractThis paper deals with the Upper Sorbian aspect categories. While the traditional inflectional opposition imperfect vs. aorist is still widely used in the standard variety, it has almost disappeared from the colloquial variety used in the Catholic area of Upper Lusatia in Eastern Germany. By contrast, the derivational opposition of perfectivity formally persists in this area but has undergone some changes which are very specific to this variety. In particular, this aspect opposition, expressed by means of prefixes and suffixes has been radically restructured, such that its functional domain has shifted from grammatical aspect to grammatical telicity. It is argued that the starting point of this change is to be sought in an identification of the Sorbian aspect-sensitive grammatical prefixes with the German prefixes which mainly express telicity in processes of word formation. Special usages dealt with in this study are, on the one hand, the expression of habituality through (formally) imperfective verbs and, surprisingly, the expression of ongoing telic processes, but also of the analytical future, by means of their perfective correlates, on the other.
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBiblioteca di Studi Slavistici
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherUpper Sorbian varieties
dc.subject.otherGerman
dc.subject.otheraspect
dc.subject.otherlanguage contact
dc.subject.othergrammatical telicity
dc.subject.othertelic processes
dc.subject.otherhabituality
dc.subject.otherfuture
dc.subject.otherprefixes
dc.titleChapter Der Verbalaspekt in der obersorbischen Umgangssprache im Sprachkontakt
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0184-1.11
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221501841
oapen.pages22
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber53
dc.abstractotherlanguageThis paper deals with the Upper Sorbian aspect categories. While the traditional inflectional opposition imperfect vs. aorist is still widely used in the standard variety, it has almost disappeared from the colloquial variety used in the Catholic area of Upper Lusatia in Eastern Germany. By contrast, the derivational opposition of perfectivity formally persists in this area but has undergone some changes which are very specific to this variety. In particular, this aspect opposition, expressed by means of prefixes and suffixes has been radically restructured, such that its functional domain has shifted from grammatical aspect to grammatical telicity. It is argued that the starting point of this change is to be sought in an identification of the Sorbian aspect-sensitive grammatical prefixes with the German prefixes which mainly express telicity in processes of word formation. Special usages dealt with in this study are, on the one hand, the expression of habituality through (formally) imperfective verbs and, surprisingly, the expression of ongoing telic processes, but also of the analytical future, by means of their perfective correlates, on the other.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access