Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.editorDuncker, Simon
dc.contributor.editorSchmidt, Almuth-Maria
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T10:32:04Z
dc.date.available2023-11-28T10:32:04Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-21
dc.identifier.urihttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/128179
dc.description.abstractThis anthology aims to address a void in the debates on assisted dying and assisted suicide, which are dominated by legal, medical, theological and practical–ethical perspectives. Liberal institutionalisation of assisted suicide has been within reach since the Federal Constitutional Court's 2020 ruling. The existential questions of determining and shaping a good life and death touched upon in this ruling challenge a democratic society to engage in political self-understanding. Is it not up to historically and socio-theoretically informed voices to conceptualise the historical upheaval critically in order to argue for an emancipatory perspective? This book is an attempt at such a conversation in six contributions. With contributions by Simon Duncker, PD Dr. Stefanie Graefe, Dr. Robin Iltzsche, Prof. Dr. Thomas Macho, Dr. Angelika Pillen und Dr. Nina Streeck.en_US
dc.languageGermanen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesZeitgenössische Diskurse des Politischenen_US
dc.subject.classificationMBNen_US
dc.subject.otherassisted suicideen_US
dc.subject.othereuthanasiaen_US
dc.subject.otherGerman Federal Constitutional Courten_US
dc.subject.otherhealth policyen_US
dc.titleSterben mit Anspruch?en_US
dc.title.alternativeSterbehilfe aus gesellschaftstheoretischer und historischer Sichten_US
dc.typebook
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
oapen.abstract.otherlanguageThis anthology aims to address a void in the debates on assisted dying and assisted suicide, which are dominated by legal, medical, theological and practical–ethical perspectives. Liberal institutionalisation of assisted suicide has been within reach since the Federal Constitutional Court's 2020 ruling. The existential questions of determining and shaping a good life and death touched upon in this ruling challenge a democratic society to engage in political self-understanding. Is it not up to historically and socio-theoretically informed voices to conceptualise the historical upheaval critically in order to argue for an emancipatory perspective? This book is an attempt at such a conversation in six contributions. With contributions by Simon Duncker, PD Dr. Stefanie Graefe, Dr. Robin Iltzsche, Prof. Dr. Thomas Macho, Dr. Angelika Pillen und Dr. Nina Streeck.en_US
oapen.identifier.doi10.5771/9783748937340en_US
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy20c8b06d-3b2b-4af2-acda-fbcfdfea5744
oapen.relation.isFundedByOpen Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld Universityen_US
oapen.relation.isFundedBy28a93eed-7829-4fa0-8ce6-6f5cd70e0c09
oapen.relation.isbn978-3-8487-7599-6en_US
oapen.series.number23en_US
oapen.pages160en_US
oapen.place.publicationBaden-Badenen_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/