Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBELLINI, Federico
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-17T20:56:56Z
dc.date.available2025-01-17T20:56:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:33:29Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503197_168
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96373
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/148274
dc.description.abstractThe Victorian era is often considered to have been dominated by the 'Gospel of work', that is, the ideology that identified work as one of the supreme virtues. However, starting from about the 1870s, this ideology started to be more and more radically questioned by several writers who claimed in favour of idleness. In this essay, I analyse and compare three of the most relevant British partisans of idleness of the period – Robert Louis Stevenson, Jerome K. Jerome and Oscar Wilde –, in order to show how idleness played a key role in the development of their poetic and how they contributed to its reevaluation as an alternative value for the modern times.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherIdleness
dc.subject.otherwork
dc.subject.otherStevenson Robert Louis
dc.subject.otherJerome K. Jerome
dc.subject.otherOscar Wilde
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.titleChapter La riscoperta dell’ozio nella letteratura inglese di fine Ottocento: Robert Louis Stevenson, Jerome K. Jerome, Oscar Wilde
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.79
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503197
oapen.pages10
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber257
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe Victorian era is often considered to have been dominated by the 'Gospel of work', that is, the ideology that identified work as one of the supreme virtues. However, starting from about the 1870s, this ideology started to be more and more radically questioned by several writers who claimed in favour of idleness. In this essay, I analyse and compare three of the most relevant British partisans of idleness of the period – Robert Louis Stevenson, Jerome K. Jerome and Oscar Wilde –, in order to show how idleness played a key role in the development of their poetic and how they contributed to its reevaluation as an alternative value for the modern times.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access