Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSIMONAZZI, Mauro
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-18T13:50:57Z
dc.date.available2025-01-18T13:50:57Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:32:48Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503197_152
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96357
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/148330
dc.description.abstractMandeville lives in a transitional age in which economics, morality and politics are not clearly distinguished. He emphasises the contrast between the emerging economic rationality and Christian ethics, between utilitarianism and strict ethics. The motto 'private vices, public benefits' highlights this contradiction. The Dutch philosopher is not an economist in the modern sense, but he questions the causes of the nation's wealth and adopts some of the assumptions of mercantilism, such as the importance of a surplus balance of trade and the policy of low wages. He argues that the primary cause of a nation's wealth is wage labour and is one of the first to grasp the importance of the division of labour. He distinguishes between two types of work: wage labour, which only concerns the poor and is performed out of sheer necessity, and self-employment, which, on the other hand, allows for the satisfaction of the fundamental passions of human nature, such as the desire to improve one's condition and to be esteemed.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherMandeville
dc.subject.otherdivision of labour
dc.subject.otherpoor
dc.subject.otherwage labour
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.titleChapter Razionalità economica, lavoro salariato e divisione del lavoro in Mandeville
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.62
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503197
oapen.pages7
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber257
dc.abstractotherlanguageMandeville lives in a transitional age in which economics, morality and politics are not clearly distinguished. He emphasises the contrast between the emerging economic rationality and Christian ethics, between utilitarianism and strict ethics. The motto 'private vices, public benefits' highlights this contradiction. The Dutch philosopher is not an economist in the modern sense, but he questions the causes of the nation's wealth and adopts some of the assumptions of mercantilism, such as the importance of a surplus balance of trade and the policy of low wages. He argues that the primary cause of a nation's wealth is wage labour and is one of the first to grasp the importance of the division of labour. He distinguishes between two types of work: wage labour, which only concerns the poor and is performed out of sheer necessity, and self-employment, which, on the other hand, allows for the satisfaction of the fundamental passions of human nature, such as the desire to improve one's condition and to be esteemed.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access