Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorPongratz, Stephan
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-28T16:27:13Z
dc.date.available2025-01-28T16:27:13Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:41:26Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221504033_344
dc.identifier2704-6079
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96550
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/150310
dc.description.abstractThe Vitae of various popes written by Pandulf and Boso, two of the most important sources on papal history of the 12th century, share a decisive commonality in their connection to the older Liber pontificalis. If one compares both authors in their role as continuators of the papal book, the parallels but also differences in their conceptions of history emerge with new clarity. While Boso, in optimistic trust in God, tried to interweave a golden past with a triumphant future, Pandulf openly addressed the failures and disasters of recent pontificates. His work appears in this light as a memorial of the decline experienced by Anaclet II’s curia.
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReti Medievali E-Book
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ages
dc.subject.other11th-12th centuries
dc.subject.otherRome
dc.subject.otherhistoriography
dc.subject.otherpapal history
dc.subject.otherschism
dc.subject.otherPope Alexander III
dc.subject.otherpopes and emperors
dc.subject.otherChristianity
dc.subject.othercardinals
dc.subject.otherLiber pontificalis
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.titleChapter Selbstbehauptung durch Traditionsbildung? Zwei Fortsetzer des Liber pontificalis in den Schismen des 12. Jahrhunderts
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0403-3.15
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221504033
oapen.pages17
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber47
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe Vitae of various popes written by Pandulf and Boso, two of the most important sources on papal history of the 12th century, share a decisive commonality in their connection to the older Liber pontificalis. If one compares both authors in their role as continuators of the papal book, the parallels but also differences in their conceptions of history emerge with new clarity. While Boso, in optimistic trust in God, tried to interweave a golden past with a triumphant future, Pandulf openly addressed the failures and disasters of recent pontificates. His work appears in this light as a memorial of the decline experienced by Anaclet II’s curia.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access