Chapter Le tecniche interpretative nel diritto del lavoro tra cognitivismo e bilanciamento ‘creativo’
| dc.contributor.author | DE LUCA TAMAJO, Raffaele | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-29T15:18:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-29T15:18:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-12-20T12:51:10Z | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20241220_9791221505078_559 | |
| dc.identifier | 2704-5919 | |
| dc.identifier | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96767 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/150395 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The essay intends to demonstrate that, beyond any polarising approach to the subject of opposing interpretative theories, it is the structure of the single norm that each time authorises interpreters to leave room for their cultural heritage and values or, instead, binds them to an ‘aseptic’ and ‘faithful’ application of legal provisions. This assumption is tested in relation to different legal frameworks and institutions. | |
| dc.language | Italian | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Studi e saggi | |
| dc.rights | open access | |
| dc.subject.other | Balancing | |
| dc.subject.other | interpretation | |
| dc.subject.other | elastic clauses | |
| dc.subject.other | thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general | |
| dc.title | Chapter Le tecniche interpretative nel diritto del lavoro tra cognitivismo e bilanciamento ‘creativo’ | |
| dc.type | chapter | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.21 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9791221505078 | |
| oapen.pages | 19 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Florence | |
| dc.seriesnumber | 259 | |
| dc.abstractotherlanguage | The essay intends to demonstrate that, beyond any polarising approach to the subject of opposing interpretative theories, it is the structure of the single norm that each time authorises interpreters to leave room for their cultural heritage and values or, instead, binds them to an ‘aseptic’ and ‘faithful’ application of legal provisions. This assumption is tested in relation to different legal frameworks and institutions. |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described
as
open access