Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorORLANDINI, GIOVANNI
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-29T22:15:09Z
dc.date.available2025-01-29T22:15:09Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:51:53Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221505078_575
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96783
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/150416
dc.description.abstractFollowing in the wake of the jurisprudence formed in the previous legal framework, the 2003 reform introduced into the legal system a regulation of posting conditioned by its qualification as an exception to the general prohibition of interposition. In doing so, an opportunity was missed to fully regulate the institution, based rather on the function and nature of the agreement between the employer and the user that posting necessarily presupposes. Starting from this regulatory gap, the author proposes a reinterpretation of the discipline dictated by Article 30, legislative decree 276/03, of which he highlights criticalities and inconsistencies that can only be partially resolved by enhancing the principles of civil law.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherPosting of workers
dc.subject.otherentitlement of the employment relation
dc.subject.othercontract law
dc.subject.otherjoint liability
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
dc.titleChapter Appunti per una ridefinizione dell’istituto del distacco
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.37
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221505078
oapen.pages12
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber259
dc.abstractotherlanguageFollowing in the wake of the jurisprudence formed in the previous legal framework, the 2003 reform introduced into the legal system a regulation of posting conditioned by its qualification as an exception to the general prohibition of interposition. In doing so, an opportunity was missed to fully regulate the institution, based rather on the function and nature of the agreement between the employer and the user that posting necessarily presupposes. Starting from this regulatory gap, the author proposes a reinterpretation of the discipline dictated by Article 30, legislative decree 276/03, of which he highlights criticalities and inconsistencies that can only be partially resolved by enhancing the principles of civil law.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access