Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorCESTER, CARLO
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-30T05:15:47Z
dc.date.available2025-01-30T05:15:47Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:50:56Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221505078_554
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96762
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/150444
dc.description.abstractThe article discusses two recent Constitutional Court rulings, nos. 7 and 22 of 2024, concerning sanctions against unlawful dismissals. The first decision rejected the constitutional challenge (also in relation to European law) regarding the exclusion of reinstatement in cases of unlawful collective dismissals due to a violation of the selection criteria among workers, as provided by Article 18 of Law no. 300/1970. In the second ruling, however, the Court declared the unconstitutionality of the provision in Legislative Decree no. 23/2015 (Jobs Act), which allowed reinstatement only when nullity was explicitly provided for by law. The author generally agrees with both rulings, albeit with some clarifications.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherConstitutional legitimacy issues
dc.subject.othercollective dismissals
dc.subject.otherviolation of selection criteria
dc.subject.otherconsequences
dc.subject.otherindividual dismissals
dc.subject.othernullity not explicitly provided for
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNH Employment and labour law: general
dc.titleChapter Ancora due interventi della Corte costituzionale sul regime sanzionatorio del licenziamento illegittimo
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0507-8.16
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221505078
oapen.pages16
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber259
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe article discusses two recent Constitutional Court rulings, nos. 7 and 22 of 2024, concerning sanctions against unlawful dismissals. The first decision rejected the constitutional challenge (also in relation to European law) regarding the exclusion of reinstatement in cases of unlawful collective dismissals due to a violation of the selection criteria among workers, as provided by Article 18 of Law no. 300/1970. In the second ruling, however, the Court declared the unconstitutionality of the provision in Legislative Decree no. 23/2015 (Jobs Act), which allowed reinstatement only when nullity was explicitly provided for by law. The author generally agrees with both rulings, albeit with some clarifications.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access