Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBorsari, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-30T10:28:31Z
dc.date.available2025-01-30T10:28:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:34:19Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503197_187
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96392
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/150461
dc.description.abstractThe epochal scenario in which twentieth-century philosophical anthropology enforced its proposal has its focal point in the variously modulated attempt to connect bodies, action and work. The present contribution aims to follow such a research model from its initial approach formulated by Max Scheler by linking knowledge and work (§ 2), through the declinations given by Arnold Gehlen, between philosophy of action and sociology of work (§ 3), and Helmuth Plessner, between definition of human eccentricity and analysis of the organization of work (§ 4). To conclude with a sketchy exploration of a possible different direction for anthropological reflection on the assumptions of making and producing in the intertwining of bodies and materials (§ 5).
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherwork
dc.subject.otherknowledge
dc.subject.otherphilosophy of action
dc.subject.othersociology of work
dc.subject.otherPhilosophical Anthropology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.titleChapter Il lavoro nella ricerca dell’antropologia filosofica: Gehlen e Plessner
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.98
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503197
oapen.pages12
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber257
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe epochal scenario in which twentieth-century philosophical anthropology enforced its proposal has its focal point in the variously modulated attempt to connect bodies, action and work. The present contribution aims to follow such a research model from its initial approach formulated by Max Scheler by linking knowledge and work (§ 2), through the declinations given by Arnold Gehlen, between philosophy of action and sociology of work (§ 3), and Helmuth Plessner, between definition of human eccentricity and analysis of the organization of work (§ 4). To conclude with a sketchy exploration of a possible different direction for anthropological reflection on the assumptions of making and producing in the intertwining of bodies and materials (§ 5).


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access