Show simple item record

Chapter «L’ozio è fatale soltanto ai mediocri». Tempo, lavoro, libertà in Albert Camus

dc.contributor.authorBERNI, STEFANO
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-30T18:52:27Z
dc.date.available2025-01-30T18:52:27Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:27:16Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503197_26
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96230
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/150504
dc.description.abstractThe characters present in Albert Camus novels are lazy, indolent, do not like to work, because they live in contact with nature, with the sea, with the sun, with the heat and because they suffer from the constraints of a society that is industrializing. Camus, through his characters, criticizes the ideology of work, of capitalist and consumer society. However, his criticisms do not save Marxism either, because, as in capitalism, the economic logic of labor and production remains. The real life would be that of the artist: for him the work does not follow the rhythm of machines and progress but follows the rhythm of nature and body.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherWork
dc.subject.otherFreedom
dc.subject.otherTime
dc.subject.otherIdleness
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.titleChapter «L’ozio è fatale soltanto ai mediocri». Tempo, lavoro, libertà in Albert Camus
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.103
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503197
oapen.pages6
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber257
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe characters present in Albert Camus novels are lazy, indolent, do not like to work, because they live in contact with nature, with the sea, with the sun, with the heat and because they suffer from the constraints of a society that is industrializing. Camus, through his characters, criticizes the ideology of work, of capitalist and consumer society. However, his criticisms do not save Marxism either, because, as in capitalism, the economic logic of labor and production remains. The real life would be that of the artist: for him the work does not follow the rhythm of machines and progress but follows the rhythm of nature and body.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access