Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMarcucci, Nicola
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-01T07:09:40Z
dc.date.available2025-02-01T07:09:40Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:33:39Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503197_172
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96377
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/150655
dc.description.abstractTo grasp the originality of Durkheimian reflection on labor, it is important to emphasize how it revolves around two substantive aspects: professional groups, understood as the locus of the social reorganization of labor; and the person, understood as the modern ideal whose content is defined in light of the transformation of the contractual institution. This twofold reflection on labor, results in a sociological critique of what Durkheim qualifies as the two main pathological forms of the modern division of labor: the "anomic division" and the "coercive division" of labor. Preliminarily, in order to better situate the reasons for the centrality of both of these aspects, and to better identify the critical aim of Durkheim's sociology, it seems important to understand his reflection on the transformations of power in modern societies and the consequences this reflection has on his conception of the State.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherpolitical authority
dc.subject.otheranomic and coecercive division of labor
dc.subject.otherprofessional groups
dc.subject.otherpersonhood
dc.subject.othersocialism
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.titleChapter Émile Durkheim: il lavoro dell’ideale
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.83
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503197
oapen.pages9
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber257
dc.abstractotherlanguageTo grasp the originality of Durkheimian reflection on labor, it is important to emphasize how it revolves around two substantive aspects: professional groups, understood as the locus of the social reorganization of labor; and the person, understood as the modern ideal whose content is defined in light of the transformation of the contractual institution. This twofold reflection on labor, results in a sociological critique of what Durkheim qualifies as the two main pathological forms of the modern division of labor: the "anomic division" and the "coercive division" of labor. Preliminarily, in order to better situate the reasons for the centrality of both of these aspects, and to better identify the critical aim of Durkheim's sociology, it seems important to understand his reflection on the transformations of power in modern societies and the consequences this reflection has on his conception of the State.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access