Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGiglio, Lorenzo
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T14:33:14Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T14:33:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2023-05-01T13:41:27Z
dc.identifierONIX_20230501_9788855186681_124
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62708
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/154537
dc.description.abstractThe paper examines some critical aspects of the manuscript tradition of Boccaccio’s Corbaccio, starting from the results of the very few studies on the subject. Besides proposing an updated list of all the 79 available manuscripts that hand down the work, whose yet we don’t have any critical edition, he then demonstrates, through a number of examples, the benefits of widening perspective to the codes of the non-α family, but also of a comprehensive reconsideration of the status of α itself. In the absence of a solid classification of the whole manuscript tradition, the “traditional” hypothesis that the α2 group (and in particular the Mannelli codex) represents an advanced redaction of Boccaccio’s «umile trattato» risks to be too conditioning if assumed at such a preliminary stage.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherBoccaccio
dc.subject.otherCorbaccio
dc.subject.otherManuscript Tradition
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies
dc.titleChapter Per l’edizione del Corbaccio: preliminari allo studio della tradizione
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-668-1.02
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788855186681
oapen.pages32
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber244
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe paper examines some critical aspects of the manuscript tradition of Boccaccio’s Corbaccio, starting from the results of the very few studies on the subject. Besides proposing an updated list of all the 79 available manuscripts that hand down the work, whose yet we don’t have any critical edition, he then demonstrates, through a number of examples, the benefits of widening perspective to the codes of the non-α family, but also of a comprehensive reconsideration of the status of α itself. In the absence of a solid classification of the whole manuscript tradition, the “traditional” hypothesis that the α2 group (and in particular the Mannelli codex) represents an advanced redaction of Boccaccio’s «umile trattato» risks to be too conditioning if assumed at such a preliminary stage.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record