Der Prozess Jesu - aus römisch-rechtlicher Perspektive
| dc.contributor.author | Paulus, Christoph G. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-07T14:36:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-07T14:36:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-11-21T16:34:07Z | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20221121_9783110479836_53 | |
| dc.identifier | OCN: 947084247 | |
| dc.identifier | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/59505 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/154622 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Although it is clear that the trial of Jesus has been extensively discussed and described before, new aspects are revealed by a strict focus on the written text from the perspective of legal history. The author follows this approach and comes to the inexorable conclusion that Jesus`s sentence was fully consistent with the terms of Roman penal and procedural law. | |
| dc.language | German | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Schriftenreihe der Juristischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin | |
| dc.rights | open access | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QR Religion and beliefs::QRM Christianity::QRMF Christianity: sacred texts and revered writings::QRMF1 Bibles::QRMF13 New Testaments | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::L Law | |
| dc.subject.other | Trial of Jesus | |
| dc.title | Der Prozess Jesu - aus römisch-rechtlicher Perspektive | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.1515/9783110479836 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | af2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110479836 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110479386 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110479430 | |
| oapen.imprint | De Gruyter | |
| oapen.pages | 37 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Berlin/Boston | |
| dc.seriesnumber | 194 | |
| dc.abstractotherlanguage | Although it is clear that the trial of Jesus has been extensively discussed and described before, new aspects are revealed by a strict focus on the written text from the perspective of legal history. The author follows this approach and comes to the inexorable conclusion that Jesus`s sentence was fully consistent with the terms of Roman penal and procedural law. |
Files in this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||

