Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorT. Schütze, Carson
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T15:37:08Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T15:37:08Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-12-31 23:55:55
dc.date.submitted2018-12-12 10:19:03
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T14:20:22Z
dc.identifier603356
dc.identifierOCN: 945783708
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32839
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/156644
dc.description.abstractThroughout much of the history of linguistics, grammaticality judgments – intuitions about the well-formedness of sentences – have constituted most of the empirical base against which theoretical hypothesis have been tested. Although such judgments often rest on subtle intuitions, there is no systematic methodology for eliciting them, and their apparent instability and unreliability have led many to conclude that they should be abandoned as a source of data.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClassics in Linguistics
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherlinguistic methodology
dc.subject.othergrammaticality judgements
dc.subject.otherintuition
dc.subject.otherNoam Chomsky
dc.subject.otherParsing
dc.subject.otherSyntax
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics
dc.titleThe empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.26530/OAPEN_603356
oapen.relation.isPublishedByed03121b-b998-4b50-8d58-1d0745565558
oapen.relation.isFundedBy969f21b5-ac00-4517-9de2-44973eec6874
oapen.relation.isbn9783946234043
oapen.collectionKnowledge Unlatched (KU)
oapen.pages244
dc.relationisFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9
dc.seriesnumber3


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record