Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorFERSINI, MARIA PINA
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T16:02:30Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T16:02:30Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2022-05-31T10:29:59Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220531_9788864538297_722
dc.identifierOCN: 1097215232
dc.identifier2705-0297
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55438
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/157437
dc.description.abstractWith the rise of modernity, law faces an irreducible contradiction. It must stem the State’s available strength, while at the same time use this strength to make its decisions binding. The author, starting from this paradox, analyses the legal, philosophical and literary discourses of modernity to find the right tools to properly differentiate law and “vis”, overcoming two philosophical and juridical traditions: the one depicting law as a Leviathan, and the one wanting to make it immune to all forms of violence. In particular, through an unedited reading of Kafka and Melville’s narratives, she demonstrates how the modern legal systems, rather than just being instruments of control, are dreams and fantasies of non-violence.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPremio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»
dc.rightsopen access
dc.titleDiritto e violenza
dc.title.alternativeUn'analisi giusletteraria
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-6453-829-7
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788864538297
oapen.relation.isbn9788864538280
oapen.relation.isbn9788892730748
oapen.pages200
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber67
dc.abstractotherlanguageWith the rise of modernity, law faces an irreducible contradiction. It must stem the State’s available strength, while at the same time use this strength to make its decisions binding. The author, starting from this paradox, analyses the legal, philosophical and literary discourses of modernity to find the right tools to properly differentiate law and “vis”, overcoming two philosophical and juridical traditions: the one depicting law as a Leviathan, and the one wanting to make it immune to all forms of violence. In particular, through an unedited reading of Kafka and Melville’s narratives, she demonstrates how the modern legal systems, rather than just being instruments of control, are dreams and fantasies of non-violence.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access