Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlåsjö, Viktor
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T16:18:42Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T16:18:42Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2024-04-02T15:49:07Z
dc.identifierONIX_20240402_9791221502664_158
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/89189
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/157962
dc.description.abstractGalileo’s abilities as a mathematician were far below that of many of his contemporaries. He made numerous technical mistakes — including several high-profile, mathematically erroneous applications of his own law of fall — that were swiftly spotted and corrected by the leading mathematicians of the day. Many aspects of Galileo’s work can be viewed as consequences of this limited technical proficiency in mathematics. For example, he ignores Kepler’s work and dismisses comets as a chimerical atmospheric phenomena: decisions that are difficult to justify on scientific grounds but which make sense if we grant that Galileo wanted to avoid technical mathematics at all costs. Instead he drops rocks, looks through tubes, rails against Aristotelian philosophers, and expounds at length about basic principles of scientific method: all of which can be seen as dwelling on precisely those parts of the mathematician’s worldview that do not require any actual mathematics.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKnowledge and its Histories
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherGalileo
dc.subject.othercycloidal area
dc.subject.otherorbital speeds
dc.subject.otherextrusion by terrestrial whirling
dc.subject.otheratmospheric theory of comets
dc.titleChapter Galileo’s Mathematical Errors
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0266-4.07
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221502664
oapen.pages17
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber2
dc.abstractotherlanguageGalileo’s abilities as a mathematician were far below that of many of his contemporaries. He made numerous technical mistakes — including several high-profile, mathematically erroneous applications of his own law of fall — that were swiftly spotted and corrected by the leading mathematicians of the day. Many aspects of Galileo’s work can be viewed as consequences of this limited technical proficiency in mathematics. For example, he ignores Kepler’s work and dismisses comets as a chimerical atmospheric phenomena: decisions that are difficult to justify on scientific grounds but which make sense if we grant that Galileo wanted to avoid technical mathematics at all costs. Instead he drops rocks, looks through tubes, rails against Aristotelian philosophers, and expounds at length about basic principles of scientific method: all of which can be seen as dwelling on precisely those parts of the mathematician’s worldview that do not require any actual mathematics.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record