Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTan, Marion Lara
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Anna
dc.contributor.authorStock, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Julia S.
dc.contributor.authorKenney, Christine
dc.contributor.authorLambie, Emily
dc.contributor.authorCui, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorPrasanna, Raj
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T16:55:20Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T16:55:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2023-11-15T14:16:45Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/85143
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/159132
dc.description.abstractEarthquake early warning (EEW) for Aotearoa New Zealand is in its infancy. Establishing a public EEW system in New Zealand that can warn the general population comes with several reservations as there are many technological, societal, and cultural challenges to overcome. Even with recent technological advances, a successful EEW system will rely on people to react appropriately to the alerts and follow protective action recommendations, such as Drop, Cover, and Hold. Designing an EEW system requires a multidisciplinary approach that involves multiple stakeholders, including the public. This chapter introduces an overarching design science approach in investigating the feasibility of an EEW solution for New Zealand. It includes a participatory design method used for eight community workshops to understand people’s views on EEW. The workshop participants envisaged an EEW system for New Zealand that considers the intersections between services and technology, communication, and human behavior. They expected a holistic EEW system to incorporate public engagement, transparency, and inclusion. The design-led approach described in this chapter puts people at the center, encouraging a close engagement with communities to inform the development of relevant and trusted technological solutions. The robust engagement processes provide insights relevant to designing an EEW system for New Zealand.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherAlpine Fault, Aotearoa, CARE package, DRM, EEW, Mexico City, NGO, NHC, New Zealand, The Bahamas, participatory design, pictogram, risk, signs, visual standards, wildfire, fire, flood, global warming, government, high-rise buildings, hurricane, hydrographs, industrial design, maps, opioid overdose
dc.titleChapter 8 ‘Balancing human needs with technology’—a design-led approach for exploring an earthquake early warning system in Aotearoa New Zealand
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003306771-9
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook1fb19e15-43dd-4705-98d3-d95b1058e9e6
oapen.relation.isFundedBy510e8b5f-d92d-4be7-96a1-58cf753dd10a
oapen.relation.isFundedBy7ad73a45-f94c-4dd6-bd47-9dde3e4afd8a
oapen.relation.isbn9781032285030
oapen.relation.isbn9781032308098
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages18
dc.relationisFundedBy7ad73a45-f94c-4dd6-bd47-9dde3e4afd8a
dc.anonymitySingle-anonymised
dc.peerreviewidbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.peerreviewtitleProposal review
dc.openreviewNo
dc.responsibilityPublisher
dc.stagePre-publication
dc.reviewtypeProposal
dc.reviewertypeInternal editor
dc.reviewertypeExternal peer reviewer


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record