Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrilli, Guido
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T17:15:50Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T17:15:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2022-05-31T10:28:09Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220531_9788864535869_665
dc.identifierOCN: 1229428397
dc.identifier2705-0297
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55381
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/159770
dc.description.abstractWhat is desire? What are the powers of reason? What drives men to go beyond nature? Where to look for the foundations and fundamental forms of coexistence? Following the thread of these questions, the study aims to set up a theoretical comparison between Hegel and Hobbes, in the belief that an all-out dialogue between the two philosophers can contribute to a better understanding of their respective systems. The examination of the many affinities of problematic approach, as well as of the radical divergences of the solutions, allows the profile of a self-critical modernity to emerge, sensitive to the assumptions of the project of human self-affirmation through reason and artifice.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPremio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»
dc.rightsopen access
dc.titleRagione, desiderio, artificio
dc.title.alternativeHegel e Hobbes a confronto
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-6453-586-9
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788864535869
oapen.relation.isbn9788864535852
oapen.relation.isbn9788892731585
oapen.pages256
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber56
dc.abstractotherlanguageWhat is desire? What are the powers of reason? What drives men to go beyond nature? Where to look for the foundations and fundamental forms of coexistence? Following the thread of these questions, the study aims to set up a theoretical comparison between Hegel and Hobbes, in the belief that an all-out dialogue between the two philosophers can contribute to a better understanding of their respective systems. The examination of the many affinities of problematic approach, as well as of the radical divergences of the solutions, allows the profile of a self-critical modernity to emerge, sensitive to the assumptions of the project of human self-affirmation through reason and artifice.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access