Show simple item record

Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie

Interpretationsbesonderheiten bei Komplementreduktionen lexikalischer Einheiten

dc.contributor.authorvon der Becke, Tanja
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T18:01:50Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T18:01:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-07-26T12:27:39Z
dc.identifierONIX_20210726_9783110726268_31
dc.identifierOCN: 1248759221
dc.identifier1612-8702
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50228
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/161114
dc.description.abstractTransitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb.
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLinguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFG Semantics, discourse analysis, stylistics
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFK Grammar, syntax and morphology
dc.subject.otherArgument omission
dc.subject.otherpolysemy
dc.subject.otherverb valency
dc.titleSemantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie
dc.title.alternativeInterpretationsbesonderheiten bei Komplementreduktionen lexikalischer Einheiten
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110726268
oapen.relation.isPublishedByaf2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5
oapen.relation.isbn9783110726268
oapen.relation.isbn9783110726831
oapen.relation.isbn9783110726374
oapen.imprintDe Gruyter
oapen.pages355
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston
dc.seriesnumber91
dc.abstractotherlanguageTransitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access