Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeonhard, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T19:01:18Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T19:01:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-04-05T12:30:23Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220405_9783110765113_20
dc.identifierOCN: 1309867166
dc.identifier2198-8676
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/53721
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/163045
dc.description.abstractIn this volume, corpus-linguistic methods and spontaneous language data have been utilized to prove that the tense forms preterite and pluperfect have reestablished themselves in German Alemannic. The reason for this is the influence of standard language. The partial reversal of the disappearance of the preterite is not process of suppression rather, the four tenses praeterite, perfect, pluperfect and double perfect form a complementary system.
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEmpirische Linguistik / Empirical Linguistics
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFF Historical and comparative linguistics::CFFD Dialect, slang and jargon
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFK Grammar, syntax and morphology
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFX Computational and corpus linguistics
dc.subject.otherDialectology
dc.subject.otherMorphology
dc.subject.otherPreterit
dc.subject.otherDouble Perfect
dc.titleDie Vergangenheitstempora im Alemannischen Deutschlands
dc.title.alternativeEine korpusbasierte quantitative und qualitative Untersuchung
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110765113
oapen.relation.isPublishedByaf2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5
oapen.relation.isFundedByUniversitätsbibliothek Freiburg
oapen.relation.isFundedByMinisterium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst des Landes Baden-Württemberg
oapen.relation.isFundedByc1345025-a2a4-449e-af7c-c998e8fc04a1
oapen.relation.isFundedByf35c1bc7-0363-437d-a292-2234b97ec90a
oapen.relation.isbn9783110765113
oapen.relation.isbn9783110765083
oapen.relation.isbn9783110765151
oapen.imprintDe Gruyter
oapen.pages304
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston
oapen.grant.programOpen Access Publishing
oapen.grant.program[…]
dc.relationisFundedByc1345025-a2a4-449e-af7c-c998e8fc04a1
dc.relationisFundedByf35c1bc7-0363-437d-a292-2234b97ec90a
dc.seriesnumber17
dc.abstractotherlanguageIn this volume, corpus-linguistic methods and spontaneous language data have been utilized to prove that the tense forms preterite and pluperfect have reestablished themselves in German Alemannic. The reason for this is the influence of standard language. The partial reversal of the disappearance of the preterite is not process of suppression rather, the four tenses praeterite, perfect, pluperfect and double perfect form a complementary system.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access