Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWidmer, Elisabeth Theresia
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T19:56:34Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T19:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-02-23T13:31:26Z
dc.identifierONIX_20240223_9783111331843_81
dc.identifierOCN: 1409702151
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/87884
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/164754
dc.description.abstractWidmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue. ; Widmer sheds light on a neglected aspect of the Western philosophical tradition. Following an era of Hegelianism, the members of the neo-Kantian "Marburg School," such as Friedrich Albert Lange, Hermann Cohen, Rudolf Stammler, Paul Natorp, and Ernst Cassirer defended socialism or left-wing ideals on Kantian principles. In doing so, Widmer breaks with two mistaken assumptions. First, Widmer demonstrates that the left-Hegelian and Marxist traditions were not the only significant philosophical sources of socialist critique in nineteenth-century Germany, as the left-Kantians identified problems of normativity that the left-Hegelians could not adequately address. Second, Widmer challenges the prevailing assumption that the political philosophies developed in the Marburg School can be comprehensively characterized as a unified school of "ethical socialism." By showing that they varied fundamentally regarding their political views and their philosophical foundations of socialism, Widmer fills a gap in the studies of neo-Kantianism that is long overdue.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNew Studies in the History and Historiography of Philosophy
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought::QDHR Western philosophy from c 1800
dc.subject.otherNeo-Kantianismus
dc.subject.othersoziales und politisches Denken
dc.subject.otherAlternativen zum Marxismus
dc.subject.otherGeschichte der westlichen Philosophie
dc.subject.otherNeo-Kantianism
dc.subject.othersocial and political thought
dc.subject.otheralternatives to Marxism
dc.subject.otherhistory of western philosophy
dc.titleLeft-Kantianism in the Marburg School
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783111331843
oapen.relation.isPublishedByaf2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5
oapen.relation.isbn9783111331843
oapen.relation.isbn9783111331904
oapen.relation.isbn9783111331775
oapen.imprintDe Gruyter
oapen.pages154
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston
dc.seriesnumber13


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access