Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichter, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorMünchow, Hannes
dc.contributor.authorAbendroth, Johanna
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T20:05:51Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T20:05:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2021-06-25T10:33:05Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49685
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/165035
dc.description.abstractThe internet is the primary source of information about a broad range of topics, which may range from consumer and medical decisions to political and socio-scientific issues. The relevant information is often available in the form of written texts that convey divergent perspectives, such as different opinions, competing theoretical assumptions, arguments and counterarguments, and evidence and counterevidence. What are the challenges and potential problems associated with comprehending texts that convey multiple perspectives? How can students be supported to make the most of this obviously complicated reading situation? This chapter attempts to answer these questions from a particular theoretical perspective that revolves around the notion that readers routinely validate text information against pertinent and accessible knowledge and beliefs. We will discuss how validation acts in concert with the two other major component processes of text comprehension, activation and integration. This discussion will be followed by an outline of the Two-step Model of Validation, a model that makes predictions about circumstances that enable or hinder readers to form a coherent and consistent mental representation out of multiple perspectives.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherThe Role of Validation in Integrating Multiple Perspectives, Handbook of Learning from Multiple Representations and Perspectives, Tobias Richter, Hannes Münchow, Johanna Abendroth, validity, two-step model, beliefs, comprehension, integration, multiple texts, text comprehension, digital learning, knowledge creation, componential information, conflicting information
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNC Educational psychology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education::JNV Educational equipment and technology, computer-aided learning (CAL)
dc.titleChapter 16 The Role of Validation in Integrating Multiple Perspectives
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook111e1d97-afc1-41b2-9aea-a8d2be034965
oapen.relation.isbn9780367001162
oapen.relation.isbn9780367001179
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages18
dc.anonymitySingle-anonymised
dc.peerreviewidbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.peerreviewtitleProposal review
dc.openreviewNo
dc.responsibilityPublisher
dc.stagePre-publication
dc.reviewtypeProposal
dc.reviewertypeInternal editor
dc.reviewertypeExternal peer reviewer


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record