Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorLahusen, Christian
dc.contributor.authorWacker, Marius
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T20:06:56Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T20:06:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-10-17 14:05:13
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T10:15:04Z
dc.identifier1005143
dc.identifierOCN: 1135856825
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/24960
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/165068
dc.description.abstractThe European Union started to coordinate and harmonise the asylum policies of their Member States in 1999 within a common ‘area of freedom, security and justice’, as stipulated by the Treaty of Amsterdam. However, the communitarisation of asylum policies by the EU has not met its main targets, despite the installation of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) and several attempts to implement and improve these regulations and directives by means of legislative reforms, political programmes and administrative initiatives. Today, we are still far from a European-wide asylum regime that implements harmonised procedures, and grants equivalent protection titles across all Member States (Council of the European Union, 2016a). National asylum systems and recognition rates continue to differ widely within the EU (AIDA, 2017; EASO, 2017a).
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherEuropean Union
dc.subject.otherpublic administration
dc.subject.otherasylum policy
dc.subject.otherDublin
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government
dc.titleChapter 8 A European field of public administration?
dc.title.alternativeAdministrative cooperation of asylum agencies in the Dublin system
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook0aac99f3-b8a2-4ae5-ae4f-2abac43bff71
oapen.relation.isbn9781351189996
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages24
dc.anonymitySingle-anonymised
dc.peerreviewidbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.peerreviewtitleProposal review
dc.openreviewNo
dc.responsibilityPublisher
dc.stagePre-publication
dc.reviewtypeProposal
dc.reviewertypeInternal editor
dc.reviewertypeExternal peer reviewer


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée