Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMeijer, Maaike
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T20:18:19Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T20:18:19Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023-10-12T13:13:50Z
dc.identifierONIX_20231012_9789048560110_4
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/76678
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/165413
dc.description.abstractIn this essay I discuss Buikema’s ideas about the specific function of literature in times of social upheaval and political violence. Buikema resists the current tendency to reduce engaged novels to their political views and statements about the world. To their author’s intentions, basically. A literary analysis has to do justice to the ways in which political themes are represented, which largely escape authorial control. Close (inter)textual analysis can arrive at different experiences of a work of art. Buikema illustrated this conviction with an analysis of Coetzee’s Disgrace. I continue her analysis and read Disgrace for its stunning literary representation of hegemonic masculinity and how a white macho man is transformed and healed. Women and blacks guide him in this process.
dc.languageDutch
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherCoetzee’s Disgrace
dc.subject.otherrepresentation
dc.subject.othermasculinity
dc.subject.otherliterary interpretation
dc.subject.otherintertextuality
dc.titleChapter Coetzee’s Disgrace
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.5117/9789048560110_meijer
oapen.relation.isPublishedByde2ecbe7-1037-4e96-8c3a-5a842d921e04
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook761b628d-ee6d-4c62-8609-e30a5a7395aa
oapen.relation.isFundedByb586072e-2e5d-469f-8332-217c0beb5b08
oapen.relation.isFundedBy4d864437-7722-4c66-b80f-140a98d4bca9
oapen.relation.isbn9789048560110
oapen.relation.isbn9789048560127
oapen.pages10
oapen.place.publicationAmsterdam
oapen.grant.number[...]
oapen.grant.number[...]
dc.relationisFundedByb586072e-2e5d-469f-8332-217c0beb5b08
dc.relationisFundedBy4d864437-7722-4c66-b80f-140a98d4bca9
dc.abstractotherlanguageIn this essay I discuss Buikema’s ideas about the specific function of literature in times of social upheaval and political violence. Buikema resists the current tendency to reduce engaged novels to their political views and statements about the world. To their author’s intentions, basically. A literary analysis has to do justice to the ways in which political themes are represented, which largely escape authorial control. Close (inter)textual analysis can arrive at different experiences of a work of art. Buikema illustrated this conviction with an analysis of Coetzee’s Disgrace. I continue her analysis and read Disgrace for its stunning literary representation of hegemonic masculinity and how a white macho man is transformed and healed. Women and blacks guide him in this process.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée