Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGooding, Piers
dc.contributor.authorMaker, Yvette
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T20:36:44Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T20:36:44Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2023-11-17T13:34:17Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/85204
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/165967
dc.description.abstractThis chapter considers the use of automated and AI-enabled technologies in forensic mental health contexts, focusing on the use of predictive analytics in risk assessment. Risk assessment in forensic mental health care has been the subject of longstanding experimentation in quantitative techniques of prediction. Evolving algorithmic technologies and the increasing complexity of global networks of information and communication technology create additional possibilities, particularly with the advent of remote biometric monitoring and surveillance technologies. This chapter examines the legal implications of these developments by engaging with two threads of Bernadette McSherry’s work: (1) the use of actuarial risk assessments to predict and manage people deemed dangerous or ‘risky’ to themselves or others; and (2) the human rights implications of predictive practices that result in compulsory treatment, supervision or preventive detention of people with mental health conditions and disabilities. It seeks to extend McSherry’s work by considering potential benefits and shortcomings of a human rights-informed approach to governing emerging algorithmic risk assessment technologies in forensic mental health contexts, and identifying avenues for further research to inform critique and reform in this rapidly evolving field.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherBernadette McSherry, Coercion, Courts, Criminal Law, Disability, Future, Law Reform, Mental Health Law, Restrictive Practices, Risk and Risk Assessment, Seclusion and Restraint, Sentencing, Technology
dc.titleChapter 13 The Digital Turn in Mental Health and Disability Law
dc.title.alternativeActuarial Traditions and AI Futures of Risk Assessment From a Human Rights Perspective
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9781003350644-17
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookfbba6a5f-f19a-4ada-ba31-b1e71646af12
oapen.relation.isFundedBybbc445d9-5392-4cca-809a-010883b3ee8d
oapen.relation.isFundedBy2b499bba-4c72-4c14-ba3d-ad473c6e6069
oapen.relation.isbn9781032396071
oapen.relation.isbn9781032396323
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages24
dc.relationisFundedBy2b499bba-4c72-4c14-ba3d-ad473c6e6069
dc.anonymitySingle-anonymised
dc.peerreviewidbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.peerreviewtitleProposal review
dc.openreviewNo
dc.responsibilityPublisher
dc.stagePre-publication
dc.reviewtypeProposal
dc.reviewertypeInternal editor
dc.reviewertypeExternal peer reviewer


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record