Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaracciolo, Marco
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T20:47:10Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T20:47:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2023-05-01T13:42:02Z
dc.identifierONIX_20230501_9791221500455_144
dc.identifier2704-565X
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62728
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/166284
dc.description.abstractWhat is the role of interpretation—the close reading of individual texts—in cognitive literary studies? In attempting to come to grips with this vexed question, my article focuses on the complex divides that separate the practice of interpretation from cognitive-scientific research. I argue that cognitive literary studies can only fulfill their potential by moving beyond interpretation, and I survey lines of research that have already put into practice this intuition. Secondly, I explore a heuristic use of interpretation, where insights from cognitive science are leveraged—in what I call a “cognitive thematics”—to illuminate a background of metacognitive questions.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesModerna/Comparata
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.othercognitive literary studies
dc.subject.otherdistant reading
dc.subject.otherinterpretation
dc.subject.othercogntive thematics
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies
dc.titleChapter Gli studi letterari cognitivi e lo statuto dell'interpretazione: un tentativo di mappatura teorica
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0045-5.05
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221500455
oapen.pages21
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber41
dc.abstractotherlanguageWhat is the role of interpretation—the close reading of individual texts—in cognitive literary studies? In attempting to come to grips with this vexed question, my article focuses on the complex divides that separate the practice of interpretation from cognitive-scientific research. I argue that cognitive literary studies can only fulfill their potential by moving beyond interpretation, and I survey lines of research that have already put into practice this intuition. Secondly, I explore a heuristic use of interpretation, where insights from cognitive science are leveraged—in what I call a “cognitive thematics”—to illuminate a background of metacognitive questions.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record