Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorFuentes Bravo, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorGoñi Jerez, Julián
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T21:41:33Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T21:41:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2022-06-01T12:22:52Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220601_9788855183291_590
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56405
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/167908
dc.description.abstractThrough our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the possibilities of automated analysis using Natural Language Processing. We conclude by describing how an online version of the Critical Debate Model could be implemented.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCommunication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherOnline Debate
dc.subject.otherDeliberative Debate
dc.subject.otherCritical Debate Model
dc.titleChapter Online Critical Debate Model: Deliberation for the Digital Age
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.08
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788855183291
oapen.pages18
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber1


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée