Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoriat, Anne-Marie
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-07T23:53:04Z
dc.date.available2025-03-07T23:53:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2022-05-25T13:16:51Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/54695
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/171734
dc.description.abstractWhilst there are many common features in doctoral training across the world, there is considerable variation in how training is delivered, funded and supported. Approaches vary depending on the nature of the degree, on policies set at the national, institution and funder level and according to the nature of the financial support available. How then can we look at the interplay between funding and policy? This chapter sets out some of the issues affecting the current research system. Using the case study of Wellcome’s 2017 review of doctoral training, I explain how taking a systemic view can provide insight into the culture of the research system overall. I explain how the review enabled Wellcome to deliberatively design policy and practice with an explicit intent to support a more positive culture for PhD training. I reflect on how, using a social sciences approach, this experimental approach will help evolve our understanding of how such changes in policy and practice are experienced.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherPhD training; doctoral training; funding; policy; research
dc.titleChapter 9 The interplay between policy and funding
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook046b816c-e188-4206-8544-05764422a54a
oapen.relation.isFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
oapen.relation.isFundedByf6fcd900-36e2-4bc9-939e-ad820802e21f
oapen.collectionWellcome
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages9
dc.relationisFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
dc.anonymitySingle-anonymised
dc.peerreviewidbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.peerreviewtitleProposal review
dc.openreviewNo
dc.responsibilityPublisher
dc.stagePre-publication
dc.reviewtypeProposal
dc.reviewertypeInternal editor
dc.reviewertypeExternal peer reviewer


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record