Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorPolverini, Sara
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T00:17:05Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T00:17:05Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2022-05-31T10:20:59Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220531_9788866554844_375
dc.identifierOCN: 971073927
dc.identifier2705-0297
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55091
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/172440
dc.description.abstractThe Spanish civil war is considered a key point of analysis of the first half of the 1900s because of the peculiar context in which it developed, the ideologies that provoked it and for the controversies that still accompany it. An event of this magnitude has had and continues to have a great resonance in literature; this essay compares two authors at the antipodes, which well summarize the socio-political debate that accompanies the theme: José María Gironella, author close to the regime, and Juan Benet, hermetic writer. The contrast between the motivations and objectives of the two writers is accompanied by incompatible narrative choices. With memory as both a judge and a defendant, the authors open two different paths of communication with the reader: from history to man, from man to history.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPremio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»
dc.rightsopen access
dc.titleLetteratura e memoria bellica nella Spagna del XX secolo
dc.title.alternativeJosé María Gironella e Juan Benet
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-6655-484-4
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788866554844
oapen.relation.isbn9788892734807
oapen.pages238
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber28
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe Spanish civil war is considered a key point of analysis of the first half of the 1900s because of the peculiar context in which it developed, the ideologies that provoked it and for the controversies that still accompany it. An event of this magnitude has had and continues to have a great resonance in literature; this essay compares two authors at the antipodes, which well summarize the socio-political debate that accompanies the theme: José María Gironella, author close to the regime, and Juan Benet, hermetic writer. The contrast between the motivations and objectives of the two writers is accompanied by incompatible narrative choices. With memory as both a judge and a defendant, the authors open two different paths of communication with the reader: from history to man, from man to history.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access