Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorDarbo-Peschanski, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T00:29:07Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T00:29:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2022-06-01T12:16:46Z
dc.identifierONIX_20220601_9788855181600_404
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56221
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/172784
dc.description.abstractThe article compares some of the so-called Hippocratic treatises and Aristotle’s Physics, Meteorologics, Ethics and Politics, on what would define a human community, if not a nation. It shows a common absence of the notions of climate and environment but a close way of conceiving the physical continuity between the outside world (immediate or more distant) and the inside of living bodies. Then, the external conditions (seasons, temperatures, nature of the soil) similarly determine the complexions and characters of the populations that experience them. Divergences occur due to the determinism of the external conditions on politics. The Hippocratic treaties do not recognise this, unlike Aristotle, except that the Stagirite excludes from this determinism the Greek City and the virtues, including the civic virtue of justice.
dc.languageFrench
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherHuman groups
dc.subject.otherPhysical continuity
dc.subject.otherDeterminism of external conditions
dc.subject.otherEthics
dc.subject.otherPolitics
dc.titleChapter Milieu et peuples. Entre les traités hippocratiques et Aristote
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/978-88-5518-160-0.02
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9788855181600
oapen.pages12
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber214


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée