Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMihalopoulos, Bill
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T00:47:30Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T00:47:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-07-27T09:26:19Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/40104
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/173290
dc.description.abstractThis chapter adopts methodological cosmopolitanism to revisit the Maria Luz Incident (1872), a colourful diplomatic episode that involved two civil suits brought before a court created for the specific purpose of adjudicating whether the ship’s captain ill-treated and abused his Chinese ‘passengers’ while the ship was anchored for repairs in Yokohama Port. The chapter argues that the Maria Luz Incident was not a seminal moment when rights talk was introduced to Japan. Rather, the incident was due to a lack of consensus in international law regarding whether the ‘coolie trade’ was free labour or slavery. The research traces how international law and narrow ideas of freedom (the freedom to enter contracts) became aligned with the workings of Japanese licensed prostitution.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherJapanese studies
dc.subject.otherJapanese culture and society
dc.subject.otherJapanese politics
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::G Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary subjects::GT Interdisciplinary studies::GTM Regional / International studies
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHB Sociology
dc.titleChapter 1 Rethinking the Maria Luz Incident
dc.title.alternativemethodological cosmopolitanism and Meiji Japan
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.4324/9780367821494
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookNew Frontiers in Japanese Studies
oapen.relation.isbn9780367406806
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages13
dc.anonymitySingle-anonymised
dc.peerreviewidbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.peerreviewtitleProposal review
dc.openreviewNo
dc.responsibilityPublisher
dc.stagePre-publication
dc.reviewtypeProposal
dc.reviewertypeInternal editor
dc.reviewertypeExternal peer reviewer


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée