Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBivins, Roberta
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T01:37:39Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T01:37:39Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-06-18T13:55:04Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49621
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/174555
dc.description.abstractLike their peers across western Europe, Australia and the Americas, large segments of the British public and a significant proportion of Britain’s medical establishment have enthusiastically promoted medical screening (and de facto medical selection) of would-be migrants since World War II. Moreover, from 1962, British law explicitly empowered medical inspection and the exclusion of migrants on health grounds at all three of Britain’s idiosyncratic ‘medical borders’: during entry clearance procedures in their countries of origin; at Britain’s ports and airports; and via public health surveillance in the British towns and cities that were the migrants’ destinations. However, Britain’s geographical and internal borders were largely unmedicalised in the twentieth century and remain comparatively free from specifically medical controls even today. I explore the role of the National Health Service – both as a national symbol and as a physical institution – in shaping and responding to this paradox. Given the intensity of popular suspicions of migrants’ bodies and their hygienic and reproductive practices, and the frequency with which medical claims mediated and bolstered anti-migrant rhetoric, why has medical ‘control’ itself proven politically elusive and persistently suspect?
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRethinking borders
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.othermedical borders; racialised migrants; health controls; medical inspection; United Kingdom; Commonwealth; migration; National Health Service; medical surveillance
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::P Mathematics and Science::PS Biology, life sciences::PSX Human biology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing::MB Medicine: general issues::MBX History of medicine
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JH Sociology and anthropology::JHM Anthropology::JHMC Social and cultural anthropology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBF Social and ethical issues::JBFH Migration, immigration and emigration
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::5 Interest qualifiers::5P Relating to specific groups and cultures or social and cultural interests::5PB Relating to peoples: ethnic groups, indigenous peoples, cultures and other groupings of people::5PBC Relating to migrant groups / diaspora communities or peoples
dc.titleChapter 9 ‘Suspect’ screening
dc.title.alternativethe limits of Britain’s medicalised borders, 1962–1981
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybcb4ab08-c525-4e6c-88e5-a0cf0a175533
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookb02de4da-9841-4a2d-98e9-2bd00c457c4b
oapen.relation.isFundedByf6fcd900-36e2-4bc9-939e-ad820802e21f
oapen.relation.isFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
oapen.collectionWellcome
oapen.pages29
oapen.place.publicationManchester
oapen.grant.number104837/Z/14/Z
dc.relationisFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record