Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorPARADISI, MONICA
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T02:15:58Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T02:15:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2023-05-01T13:39:57Z
dc.identifierONIX_20230501_9791221500813_82
dc.identifier2704-5781
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/62666
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/175473
dc.description.abstractPerception of mattering, defined as individual’s feeling of being important for others (Rosenberg and McCullogh 1981), is a construct which in the recent years has received an increasing amount of attention as a factor able to improve people well-being. Individual well-being has been defined in different ways: hedonic as satisfaction with life (Diener and Lucas 1999), eudaimonic that is the feeling of realization of the proper true self (Ryff 1995), and holistic, namely the satisfaction toward different life domains (Prilleltensky et al. 2015). Given the various definitions, it was necessary to systematize this literature in order to clarify if perceived mattering is linked to well-being independently of the perspective adopted by researchers to conceptualize this construct. Therefore, a systematic review, following the PRISMA statement, was conducted. The final number of included studies was 39 (22 hedonic, 9 eudaimonic and 9 holistic well-being). Almost all the studies reported a positive association between mattering and well-being except for some differences due to participants’ gender or cultural background. Results indicated the positive role of mattering in promoting well-being independently from the conceptualization adopted.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudies on Adult Learning and Education
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherMattering
dc.subject.otherSystematic Review
dc.subject.otherWell-being
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences
dc.titleChapter La relazione tra il costrutto di mattering e il benessere nelle sue concettualizzazioni (edonico, eudaimonico e olistico). A systematic review
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0081-3.32
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221500813
oapen.pages4
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber15
dc.abstractotherlanguagePerception of mattering, defined as individual’s feeling of being important for others (Rosenberg and McCullogh 1981), is a construct which in the recent years has received an increasing amount of attention as a factor able to improve people well-being. Individual well-being has been defined in different ways: hedonic as satisfaction with life (Diener and Lucas 1999), eudaimonic that is the feeling of realization of the proper true self (Ryff 1995), and holistic, namely the satisfaction toward different life domains (Prilleltensky et al. 2015). Given the various definitions, it was necessary to systematize this literature in order to clarify if perceived mattering is linked to well-being independently of the perspective adopted by researchers to conceptualize this construct. Therefore, a systematic review, following the PRISMA statement, was conducted. The final number of included studies was 39 (22 hedonic, 9 eudaimonic and 9 holistic well-being). Almost all the studies reported a positive association between mattering and well-being except for some differences due to participants’ gender or cultural background. Results indicated the positive role of mattering in promoting well-being independently from the conceptualization adopted.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée