Wissenschaftsleugnung
Fallstudien, philosophische Analysen und Vorschläge zur Wissenschaftskommunikation
| dc.contributor.editor | Christian, Alexander | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Gawel, Ina | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-08T03:02:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-08T03:02:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-11-06T10:38:48Z | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20241106_9783110788341_58 | |
| dc.identifier | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/94338 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/176730 | |
| dc.description.abstract | What should scholarship do about research denialism? Can the research community solve this problem – should it even try? Can research communication help here? Does it make sense, where are its limits, and how can it be integrated into academic training? This volume discusses issues of philosophy, history, and research communication using examples such as well-known case studies. | |
| dc.language | German | |
| dc.rights | open access | |
| dc.subject.other | Research | |
| dc.subject.other | skepticism | |
| dc.subject.other | conspiracy theories | |
| dc.subject.other | Holocaust denial | |
| dc.subject.other | Covid-19 denial | |
| dc.subject.other | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBF Social and ethical issues::JBFF Social impact of disasters / accidents (natural or man-made) | |
| dc.subject.other | thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBG Popular beliefs and controversial knowledge::JBGX Conspiracy theories | |
| dc.subject.other | thema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTS Social and political philosophy | |
| dc.title | Wissenschaftsleugnung | |
| dc.title.alternative | Fallstudien, philosophische Analysen und Vorschläge zur Wissenschaftskommunikation | |
| dc.type | book | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.1515/978311078834 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | af2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5 | |
| oapen.relation.isFundedBy | 0f8fb6d1-9b96-46ad-913d-c15be238a536 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110788341 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110788303 | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9783110788358 | |
| oapen.imprint | De Gruyter | |
| oapen.pages | 309 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Berlin/Boston | |
| oapen.grant.number | [...] | |
| dc.relationisFundedBy | 0f8fb6d1-9b96-46ad-913d-c15be238a536 | |
| dc.abstractotherlanguage | What should scholarship do about research denialism? Can the research community solve this problem – should it even try? Can research communication help here? Does it make sense, where are its limits, and how can it be integrated into academic training? This volume discusses issues of philosophy, history, and research communication using examples such as well-known case studies. |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
| Fichiers | Taille | Format | Vue |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document. |
|||