Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkar, Gustaf Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorAasen, Arne Johannes
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T03:42:21Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T03:42:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021-06-17T08:26:36Z
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49601
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/177697
dc.description.abstractSome 15 years ago, all teachers in Norway became writing teachers—at least according to the new curriculum—overnight. Following a “PISA-shock” in the early 2000s, Norwegian legislators decided to reform the national curriculum by introducing five cross-curricular “key competencies” to be taught by all teachers: writing, reading, mathematics, ICT and oracy. To accommodate teachers other than language arts teachers, the curriculum was amended to include subject-specific writing characteristics. This purpose of this chapter is twofold. First, an overview description of writing instruction in Norwegian schools using official documents as the main source is provided. Second, aided by a newly developed writing competency model, a fine-grained review of the language arts subject syllabi, the chapter presents an analysis of how writing and writing development is framed in the language arts subject syllabi.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherwriting studies, writing development, cross-national writing research, school writing, curricular analysis, curriculum, assessment tools, national education
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education
dc.titleChapter 10 School writing in Norway
dc.title.alternativeFifteen years with writing as key competence
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook6c1ca62b-865f-4cf7-a7c0-ef2cb20b444f
oapen.relation.isbn9780367508142
oapen.relation.isbn9780367508166
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages26
dc.anonymitySingle-anonymised
dc.peerreviewidbc80075c-96cc-4740-a9f3-a234bc2598f1
dc.peerreviewtitleProposal review
dc.openreviewNo
dc.responsibilityPublisher
dc.stagePre-publication
dc.reviewtypeProposal
dc.reviewertypeInternal editor
dc.reviewertypeExternal peer reviewer


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record