Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorParkhurst, Justin
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T04:54:23Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T04:54:23Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-11-01 23:55:55
dc.date.submitted2018-08-08 11:53:54
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T13:20:29Z
dc.identifier640550
dc.identifierOCN: 963180218
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31002
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/180438
dc.description.abstractThere has been an enormous increase in interest in the use of evidence for public policymaking, but the vast majority of work on the subject has failed to engage with the political nature of decision making and how this influences the ways in which evidence will be used (or misused) within political areas. This book provides new insights into the nature of political bias with regards to evidence and critically considers what an ‘improved’ use of evidence would look like from a policymaking perspective. Part I describes the great potential for evidence to help achieve social goals, as well as the challenges raised by the political nature of policymaking. It explores the concern of evidence advocates that political interests drive the misuse or manipulation of evidence, as well as counter-concerns of critical policy scholars about how appeals to ‘evidence-based policy’ can depoliticise political debates. Both concerns reflect forms of bias – the first representing technical bias, whereby evidence use violates principles of scientific best practice, and the second representing issue bias in how appeals to evidence can shift political debates to particular questions or marginalise policy-relevant social concerns. Part II then draws on the fields of policy studies and cognitive psychology to understand the origins and mechanisms of both forms of bias in relation to political interests and values. It illustrates how such biases are not only common, but can be much more predictable once we recognise their origins and manifestations in policy arenas. Finally, Part III discusses ways to move forward for those seeking to improve the use of evidence in public policymaking. It explores what constitutes ‘good evidence for policy’, as well as the ‘good use of evidence’ within policy processes, and considers how to build evidence-advisory institutions that embed key principles of both scientific good practice and democratic representation. Taken as a whole, the approach promoted is termed the ‘good governance of evidence’ – a concept that represents the use of rigorous, systematic and technically valid pieces of evidence within decision-making processes that are representative of, and accountable to, populations served.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRoutledge Studies in Governance and Public Policy Learn
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.othersocial policy
dc.subject.otherevaluation
dc.subject.otherpolicy sciences
dc.subject.otherresearch
dc.subject.otherDecision-making
dc.subject.otherDemocracy
dc.subject.otherEvidence-based medicine
dc.subject.otherEvidence-based practice
dc.subject.otherGood governance
dc.subject.otherHIV
dc.subject.otherPublic policy
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government::JPA Political science and theory
dc.titleThe Politics of Evidence
dc.title.alternativeFrom evidence -based policy to the good governance of evidence
dc.typebook
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isFundedByfb214456-da48-4ff7-a1ee-f6407a27f6be
oapen.relation.isFundedBy7292b17b-f01a-4016-94d3-d7fb5ef9fb79
oapen.relation.isbn9781315675008
oapen.collectionEuropean Research Council (ERC)
oapen.pages182
oapen.grant.number282118
oapen.grant.programFP7
dc.relationisFundedBy7292b17b-f01a-4016-94d3-d7fb5ef9fb79


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée