Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiebersohn, Yosef Z.
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T05:06:50Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T05:06:50Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2017-03-01 23:55:55
dc.date.submitted2020-03-03 03:00:34
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T13:40:03Z
dc.identifier626992
dc.identifierOCN: 774292396
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31568
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/180977
dc.description.abstractThis study tries to reconstruct the dispute over rhetoric in Hellenistic thought, by using two main interrelated axes. Firstly, it delineates the exact milieu in which this dispute took place, including locations, dates and persons. Secondly, five main arguments used against rhetoric have been reconstructed, all of which concentrate on rhetoric’s claim to be considered an art.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHypomnemata
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherClassics
dc.subject.otherCharmadas
dc.subject.otherCicero
dc.subject.otherCritolaus
dc.subject.otherOrator
dc.subject.otherPhilodemus
dc.subject.otherPlato
dc.subject.otherQuintilian
dc.subject.otherRhetoric
dc.subject.otherStoicism
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy
dc.titleThe Dispute Concerning Rhetoric in Hellenistic Thought
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.13109/9783666252945
oapen.relation.isFundedBy969f21b5-ac00-4517-9de2-44973eec6874
oapen.relation.isFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9
oapen.relation.isbn9783666252945
oapen.collectionKnowledge Unlatched (KU)
oapen.imprintVandenhoeck & Ruprecht
oapen.grant.number100402
oapen.grant.programKU Select 2016 Backlist Collection
dc.number100402
dc.relationisFundedByb818ba9d-2dd9-4fd7-a364-7f305aef7ee9


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record