Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFingerle, Maddalena
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T06:08:38Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T06:08:38Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-11-21T16:37:39Z
dc.identifierONIX_20221121_9783110794113_184
dc.identifier2749-8913
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/59675
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/183723
dc.description.abstractHow do Torquato Tasso and Giovan Battista Marino react to the vigilant and normative context between the 16th and 17th centuries? Two evasive tactics designed to safeguard lewdness and enchantment in the poems are considered, starting from the relationship the two authors had with norms and rules: allegory on the one hand, and disguise on the other. Tasso's path is evolutionary and his opinion changes according to the internalisation of laws and values that lead to a re-evaluation of his initial opinions, while Marino transgresses the rules and uses typically defensive elements - such as allegory - overturning them and inventing a concealed offensive use. In this context, the paratextual allegories of Marino's Adonis, hitherto ill-considered by critics, are thus re-evaluated, and the Tasso route is reconsidered from a perspective that sees the two authors not as victims of a censorial system, but as active participants.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVigilanzkulturen / Cultures of Vigilance
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherAllegory
dc.subject.otherinquisition
dc.subject.otherTorquato Tasso
dc.subject.otherGiovan Battista Marino
dc.subject.othercensorship.
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DC Poetry
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DS Literature: history and criticism::DSB Literary studies: general
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHD European history
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::3 Time period qualifiers::3M c 1500 onwards to present day
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHT History: specific events and topics::NHTB Social and cultural history
dc.titleLascivia mascherata
dc.title.alternativeAllegoria e travestimento in Torquato Tasso e Giovan Battista Marino
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110794113
oapen.relation.isPublishedByaf2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5
oapen.relation.isFundedByb1fc767e-a8d8-4036-a4d4-d668468cfae7
oapen.relation.isFundedBy3358520f-7ab2-42ab-80ef-88a2dbe6a901
oapen.relation.isbn9783110794113
oapen.relation.isbn9783110791242
oapen.relation.isbn9783110794274
oapen.imprintDe Gruyter
oapen.pages164
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston
oapen.grant.number394775490
dc.relationisFundedBy3358520f-7ab2-42ab-80ef-88a2dbe6a901
dc.seriesnumber3
dc.abstractotherlanguageHow do Torquato Tasso and Giovan Battista Marino react to the vigilant and normative context between the 16th and 17th centuries? Two evasive tactics designed to safeguard lewdness and enchantment in the poems are considered, starting from the relationship the two authors had with norms and rules: allegory on the one hand, and disguise on the other. Tasso's path is evolutionary and his opinion changes according to the internalisation of laws and values that lead to a re-evaluation of his initial opinions, while Marino transgresses the rules and uses typically defensive elements - such as allegory - overturning them and inventing a concealed offensive use. In this context, the paratextual allegories of Marino's Adonis, hitherto ill-considered by critics, are thus re-evaluated, and the Tasso route is reconsidered from a perspective that sees the two authors not as victims of a censorial system, but as active participants.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record