Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorKeil, Geert
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T06:54:54Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T06:54:54Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2022-11-21T16:34:18Z
dc.identifierONIX_20221121_9783110534511_59
dc.identifier1862-1244
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/59513
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/185754
dc.description.abstractThis book surveys recent debates on freedom of will, incorporating the implications of modern brain research. The author develops an original, capability-based conception of freedom of will. Geert Keil proposes that the well-understood capability for deciding one way or another is reconcilable with the findings of empirical science, but not with the metaphysical doctrine of determinism.
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGrundthemen Philosophie
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherDeterminism
dc.subject.otherMetaphysics
dc.subject.otherFreedom of Will
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDH Philosophical traditions and schools of thought
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::Q Philosophy and Religion::QD Philosophy::QDT Topics in philosophy::QDTJ Philosophy: metaphysics and ontology
dc.titleWillensfreiheit
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110534511
oapen.relation.isPublishedByaf2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5
oapen.relation.isFundedByf487a1bf-4e2a-44bc-bb8c-5bd5d1cc8536
oapen.relation.isFundedBy1fb81fbc-6733-4011-a32e-ba63efb9b33e
oapen.relation.isbn9783110534511
oapen.relation.isbn9783110533453
oapen.relation.isbn9783110533484
oapen.imprintDe Gruyter
oapen.pages322
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston
oapen.grant.number[...]
oapen.grant.programLandesdigitalisierungsprogramm für Wissenschaft und Kultur
dc.relationisFundedBy1fb81fbc-6733-4011-a32e-ba63efb9b33e
dc.abstractotherlanguageThis book surveys recent debates on freedom of will, incorporating the implications of modern brain research. The author develops an original, capability-based conception of freedom of will. Geert Keil proposes that the well-understood capability for deciding one way or another is reconcilable with the findings of empirical science, but not with the metaphysical doctrine of determinism.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée