Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorJames, Toby S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T09:18:26Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T09:18:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2019-11-19 11:04:28
dc.date.submitted2020-04-01T09:26:51Z
dc.identifier1006423
dc.identifierhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23721
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/191672
dc.description.abstractAfter a review of the rival approaches that are used to evaluate public sector performance in general, five dimensions of EMB performance are set out which are argued to be crucial for achieving democratic ideals in an electoral democracy. The aim is to set out these dimensions, and the sources of data that can be used by researchers to assess whether they are achieved. The UK and Canada are then assessed against the framework so that the utility of the model becomes clear. The concepts and framework also act as founding principles for the remainder of the book.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRoutledge Studies in Elections, Democracy and Autocracy
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherElections
dc.subject.othermanagement
dc.subject.othercorrupt practices
dc.subject.otherelection monitoring
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government
dc.titleChapter 4 Evaluating electoral management performance
dc.title.alternativethe PROSeS framework
dc.typechapter
oapen.relation.isPublishedByfa69b019-f4ee-4979-8d42-c6b6c476b5f0
oapen.relation.isPartOfBookb487d9bd-8716-450c-8c54-122e700637a6
oapen.relation.isbn9781315545172
oapen.imprintRoutledge
oapen.pages30


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée