Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlacevich, Franca
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T11:32:59Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T11:32:59Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-04-02T15:48:37Z
dc.identifierONIX_20240402_9791221502824_139
dc.identifier2975-0334
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/89170
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/197395
dc.description.abstractThe paper shows how the University of Florence interpreted the relative autonomy granted by the numerous reforms of the last 30 years, focusing on the three main functions of the university: teaching, research and public engagement. The continuous reforms weakened the processes of innovation introduced at the beginning of the 90s, with the experience of the Diploma, and forced the closure of many quality degree courses. The lack of financial and instrumental resources and the “autonomy without responsibility” limited the enhancement of the resources and knowledge present in the University, hindered the pursuit of strategic lines that reward structures and sectors of excellence and strengthen the weakest areas. The public engagement is still relatively marginal.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDialoghi con la società
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherUniversity reforms
dc.subject.otherteaching innovations
dc.subject.otheracademic research
dc.subject.otherpublic engagement
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JN Education
dc.titleChapter L’Ateneo al tempo dell’«autonomia» e delle riforme continue (1990-2020)
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0282-4.16
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221502824
oapen.pages13
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber6
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe paper shows how the University of Florence interpreted the relative autonomy granted by the numerous reforms of the last 30 years, focusing on the three main functions of the university: teaching, research and public engagement. The continuous reforms weakened the processes of innovation introduced at the beginning of the 90s, with the experience of the Diploma, and forced the closure of many quality degree courses. The lack of financial and instrumental resources and the “autonomy without responsibility” limited the enhancement of the resources and knowledge present in the University, hindered the pursuit of strategic lines that reward structures and sectors of excellence and strengthen the weakest areas. The public engagement is still relatively marginal.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record