Show simple item record

Die Basilika in Byzanz

Gestalt, Ausstattung und Funktion sowie das Verhältnis zur Kreuzkuppelkirche

dc.contributor.authorAltripp, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-08T11:49:30Z
dc.date.available2025-03-08T11:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2021-12-07T16:15:49Z
dc.identifierONIX_20211207_9783110310351_55
dc.identifier1862-1139
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/51700
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/198118
dc.description.abstractIn Byzantium, the central structure is considered archetypical. This study shows that this assumption is only partly true. It presents the basilicas of the 7th to 15th centuries, addressing questions of typology, appointments, function, and the relationship to longitudinal and central constructions. It shows that the Byzantines were more flexible in their approach to these construction types than previously assumed, a conclusion supported by theological evidence.
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMillennium-Studien / Millennium Studies
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherBasilica
dc.subject.otherarchitecture
dc.subject.otherliturgy
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHC Ancient history
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology
dc.subject.otherthema EDItEUR::3 Time period qualifiers::3K CE period up to c 1500
dc.titleDie Basilika in Byzanz
dc.title.alternativeGestalt, Ausstattung und Funktion sowie das Verhältnis zur Kreuzkuppelkirche
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.1515/9783110310351
oapen.relation.isPublishedByaf2fbfcc-ee87-43d8-a035-afb9d7eef6a5
oapen.relation.isbn9783110310351
oapen.relation.isbn9783110265026
oapen.pages346
oapen.place.publicationBerlin/Boston
dc.seriesnumber42
dc.abstractotherlanguageIn Byzantium, the central structure is considered archetypical. This study shows that this assumption is only partly true. It presents the basilicas of the 7th to 15th centuries, addressing questions of typology, appointments, function, and the relationship to longitudinal and central constructions. It shows that the Byzantines were more flexible in their approach to these construction types than previously assumed, a conclusion supported by theological evidence.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record