Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorPetzold, Kristina
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-22T10:04:54Z
dc.date.available2025-11-22T10:04:54Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.submitted2025-08-05T14:21:00Z
dc.identifierONIX_20250805T161025_9783737016667_67
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/105059
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/203610
dc.description.abstractDigitization has changed the way people communicate about books. New practices, such as book blogging or social reading, cannot be directly classified by traditional socio-cultural categories such as “literary criticism”, “labor/work”, “leisure time activity” or “marketing”. In some cases, they are even perceived as competition or threats to existing forms, such as professional (journalistic) literary criticism. Therefore, the central question of this book is how and based on which interpretation patterns, topoi and narratives the activities of book bloggers are framed as an exemplary form of these new digital practices of literature-related follow-up communication. The answer to this question not only provides insights into current developments within the literary field but also into digital working environments, in which book bloggers are involved as so-called ‘influencers’.
dc.languageGerman
dc.relation.ispartofseriesdigilit
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DS Literature: history and criticism::DSB Literary studies: general::DSBJ Literary studies: from c 2000
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBS Social groups, communities and identities::JBSY Social groups: clubs and societies
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBC Cultural and media studies::JBCT Media studies::JBCT1 Media studies: internet, digital media and society
dc.subject.otherDigital Humanities
dc.subject.otherBuchblogs
dc.subject.otherLiteratursoziologie
dc.subject.otherInfluencer-Marketing
dc.subject.otherDigitale Literaturwissenschaft
dc.subject.otherWissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse
dc.subject.otherArbeitssoziologie
dc.subject.otherDigitale Arbeit
dc.subject.otherPlattformökonomie
dc.subject.otherLiteraturkritik
dc.subject.otherDigitale Rezeption
dc.subject.otherSocial Reading
dc.subject.otherAnschlusskommunikation
dc.subject.otherBuchblogging
dc.titleBuchblogs zwischen Passion und Profession
dc.title.alternativeZur Diskursivierung digitaler literaturbezogener Anschlusskommunikation als Arbeit
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.14220/9783737016667
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy33fecb33-e7c4-4fc8-96b0-7ba2fccafba9
oapen.relation.isbn9783737016667
oapen.relation.isbn9783847116660
oapen.imprintV&R unipress
oapen.pages391
oapen.place.publicationGöttingen
dc.seriesnumber5
dc.abstractotherlanguageDigitization has changed the way people communicate about books. New practices, such as book blogging or social reading, cannot be directly classified by traditional socio-cultural categories such as “literary criticism”, “labor/work”, “leisure time activity” or “marketing”. In some cases, they are even perceived as competition or threats to existing forms, such as professional (journalistic) literary criticism. Therefore, the central question of this book is how and based on which interpretation patterns, topoi and narratives the activities of book bloggers are framed as an exemplary form of these new digital practices of literature-related follow-up communication. The answer to this question not only provides insights into current developments within the literary field but also into digital working environments, in which book bloggers are involved as so-called ‘influencers’.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access