Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorCreed, Fabiola
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-23T04:20:03Z
dc.date.available2025-11-23T04:20:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2025-07-03T15:02:57Z
dc.identifierONIX_20250703T165813_9781526170675_7
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/103940
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/204062
dc.description.abstractThe rise in melanoma skin cancer rates from the 1950s in mostly fair-skinned populations, such as in Britain, triggered a global panic on skin cancer in the 1990s. Some countries tightened restrictions on sunbeds to lower these rates, eventually leading to outright bans. However, the British government, medical experts, and the media could not deter sunbed operators and instead focused on discouraging sunbed users. Soon, the media, endorsed by psychologists, confirmed a widespread ‘condition’ across Britain, termed either ‘sunbed addiction’ or ‘tanorexia’. This ‘disorder’ became a hot topic on new women-centred talk shows in mid-1990s Britain. As this talk show genre originated in the United States of America, it encouraged an ‘American style’ of public confession culture. Although ‘American’ openness did not resonate with expectations of the British ‘stiff upper lip’, audience members aggressively contributed when topics touched on motherhood. This reflected the unanimous consensus that mothers should be ‘selfless’ and act in the best interests of their children. As such, debates on motherhood-related topics on talk shows were double edged: mothers, as talk show guests, received both intense support and scrutiny from the public. By focusing on ‘tanorexia’, this chapter therefore demonstrates how new television genres linked to third wave feminism continued a long-standing tradition of pathologising women’s pleasure – especially if it deterred them from maternal responsibilities. By historicising and contextualising talk shows, this chapter also offers novel approaches for health historians to build on, including how to evaluate the rhetorical and emotional reactions of their subjects and audience members.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocial Histories of Medicine
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::M Medicine and Nursing::MB Medicine: general issues::MBX History of medicine
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHT History: specific events and topics::NHTB Social and cultural history
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::3 Time period qualifiers::3M c 1500 onwards to present day::3MP 20th century, c 1900 to c 1999::3MPQ Later 20th century c 1950 to c 1999
dc.subject.othereveryday health
dc.subject.otherhealth humanities
dc.subject.otherintersectionality
dc.subject.othermedical humanities
dc.subject.othersocial history of medicine
dc.subject.otherwellbeing
dc.titleChapter Talk shows and 'tanorexia'
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.7765/9781526170675
oapen.relation.isPublishedBybcb4ab08-c525-4e6c-88e5-a0cf0a175533
oapen.relation.isPartOfBook‘Everyday health’, embodiment, and selfhood since 1950
oapen.relation.isFundedByf6fcd900-36e2-4bc9-939e-ad820802e21f
oapen.relation.isFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
oapen.relation.isFundedBy343879dd-7955-422b-881a-bf482aa661e2
oapen.relation.isbn9781526170675
oapen.relation.isbn9781526170651
oapen.collectionWellcome
oapen.imprintManchester University Press
oapen.pages21
oapen.place.publicationManchester
oapen.grant.number[...]
oapen.grant.number[...]
dc.relationisFundedByd859fbd3-d884-4090-a0ec-baf821c9abfd
dc.relationisFundedBy343879dd-7955-422b-881a-bf482aa661e2


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access