Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRyckbosch, Wouter
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-23T22:58:35Z
dc.date.available2025-11-23T22:58:35Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.submitted2025-08-01T15:45:51Z
dc.identifierONIX_20250801T173835_9791221506679_82
dc.identifier2975-1195
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/104632
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/204510
dc.description.abstractA new wave of empirical and data-driven studies on the history of social mobility in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Period has been emerging in recent years. This trend bears some resemblance to the wave of historical inequality studies that successfully changed the consensus of long-run trends in inequality in the past decade. In this short reflection, I argue that there are important obstacles to overcome before a similar consensus in the field of historical mobility studies can be reached. Pre-modern historians should be careful to distinguish between different types of mobility, should take contemporary perceptions of social ambition or fear into account, and should Always specify which social groups their results apply to.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDatini Studies in Economic History
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.othersocial mobility
dc.subject.otherhistory of inequality
dc.subject.otherearly modern history
dc.titleChapter Towards a new history of old mobility: obstacles and prospects
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0667-9.31
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221506679
oapen.pages11
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber5


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access