Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorFranco, Vittoria
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T02:08:42Z
dc.date.available2025-11-25T02:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:27:32Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503197_32
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96236
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/205237
dc.description.abstractHeller focuses the issue work in the 60s and 70s, mainly in three different contexts: everyday life, radical needs, the critique of Lukács’s Ontology of social being, in which “work” is presented as a model for social praxis. At the time she still used Marxian categories – no matter how unorthodox her analysis - and looked at a non-alienated society, believing in the possibility of communism. Only after she emigrated to Australia (1977) she abandoned Marxism to embrace a kind of Kierkegaardian existentialism. She maintains that work is a vital need for man, necessary to reproduce his free individuality. Later, following Marx, she developed a theory of radical needs, in which the human goal is to achieve new qualitative needs outside work time, in the disposable time. But Heller does not fail to also highlight some deficiencies and inconsistencies of the Marxian analysis on the subject.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.subject.otherWork
dc.subject.otherdisposable time
dc.subject.otheralienated labor
dc.subject.otherindividuality
dc.subject.otherradical needs
dc.titleChapter Ágnes Heller. Il lavoro come espressione di libera individualità
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.109
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503197
oapen.pages7
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber257
dc.abstractotherlanguageHeller focuses the issue work in the 60s and 70s, mainly in three different contexts: everyday life, radical needs, the critique of Lukács’s Ontology of social being, in which “work” is presented as a model for social praxis. At the time she still used Marxian categories – no matter how unorthodox her analysis - and looked at a non-alienated society, believing in the possibility of communism. Only after she emigrated to Australia (1977) she abandoned Marxism to embrace a kind of Kierkegaardian existentialism. She maintains that work is a vital need for man, necessary to reproduce his free individuality. Later, following Marx, she developed a theory of radical needs, in which the human goal is to achieve new qualitative needs outside work time, in the disposable time. But Heller does not fail to also highlight some deficiencies and inconsistencies of the Marxian analysis on the subject.


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

FichiersTailleFormatVue

Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document.

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

open access
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access