Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDri, Martina
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T05:38:18Z
dc.date.available2025-11-25T05:38:18Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2025-08-01T15:41:27Z
dc.identifierONIX_20250801T173835_9791221506020_2
dc.identifier2975-0229
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/104552
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/205313
dc.description.abstractThe contribution analyses some glosses de herbis, transmitted in an unedited Latin glossary from Bobbio, written in the IX4/4 century and preserved in Milan, Bibl. Ambrosiana, C 243 inf. Two of these glosses (Morus and Mirex), both cited as depending on works by Bede, present some problematic aspects in the identification of the sources. The glosses contain, in fact, traces of orality that suggest the circulation of an expanded, reworked or glossed version of Bede's commentary on the Gospel of Luke. Finally, a parenthetical element in a gloss taken from the Etymologiae of Isidore of Seville is examined, which, by means of a reminiscence of Paul the Deacon, offers an unexpected geographical clue confirming the glossary's North Italian provenance.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi di letterature moderne e comparate
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.otherGlossary
dc.subject.otherEtymologiae
dc.subject.otherBede
dc.subject.otherCommentary on the Gospel of Luke
dc.subject.otherPaul the Deacon
dc.titleChapter Morus, Mirex, Medica arbor: de herbis in un inedito glossario bobbiese di IX secolo
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0602-0.05
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221506020
oapen.imprintFirenze University Press, USiena Press
oapen.pages10
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber8
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe contribution analyses some glosses de herbis, transmitted in an unedited Latin glossary from Bobbio, written in the IX4/4 century and preserved in Milan, Bibl. Ambrosiana, C 243 inf. Two of these glosses (Morus and Mirex), both cited as depending on works by Bede, present some problematic aspects in the identification of the sources. The glosses contain, in fact, traces of orality that suggest the circulation of an expanded, reworked or glossed version of Bede's commentary on the Gospel of Luke. Finally, a parenthetical element in a gloss taken from the Etymologiae of Isidore of Seville is examined, which, by means of a reminiscence of Paul the Deacon, offers an unexpected geographical clue confirming the glossary's North Italian provenance.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access