Chapter Donne lavoratrici nell’antichità
| dc.contributor.author | Fermani, Arianna | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-25T12:31:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-25T12:31:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-12-20T12:30:00Z | |
| dc.identifier | ONIX_20241220_9791221503197_86 | |
| dc.identifier | 2704-5919 | |
| dc.identifier | https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96290 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/205505 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The paper examines some "scenarios" or theoretical frames of reference, within which there are very different - if not even opposite - readings of the nexus between ἔργον and γυνή. After some remarks of a methodological nature, concerning the scarcity of sources and the need to take into account, on the one hand, a very complex and stratified socio-economic framework and. on the other hand, a general idealization of female work, the contribution unfolds along the following areas of reflection: the home as the perimeter of women's work; the general disdain for women's work vs the appreciation of the intelligence and the industriousness of working women; the work as a remedy for female idleness. | |
| dc.language | Italian | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Studi e saggi | |
| dc.rights | open access | |
| dc.subject.classification | thema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history | |
| dc.subject.other | Women | |
| dc.subject.other | work | |
| dc.subject.other | home | |
| dc.subject.other | industriousness | |
| dc.title | Chapter Donne lavoratrici nell’antichità | |
| dc.type | chapter | |
| oapen.identifier.doi | 10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.16 | |
| oapen.relation.isPublishedBy | 2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a | |
| oapen.relation.isbn | 9791221503197 | |
| oapen.pages | 10 | |
| oapen.place.publication | Florence | |
| dc.seriesnumber | 257 | |
| dc.abstractotherlanguage | The paper examines some "scenarios" or theoretical frames of reference, within which there are very different - if not even opposite - readings of the nexus between ἔργον and γυνή. After some remarks of a methodological nature, concerning the scarcity of sources and the need to take into account, on the one hand, a very complex and stratified socio-economic framework and. on the other hand, a general idealization of female work, the contribution unfolds along the following areas of reflection: the home as the perimeter of women's work; the general disdain for women's work vs the appreciation of the intelligence and the industriousness of working women; the work as a remedy for female idleness. |
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
| Fichiers | Taille | Format | Vue |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Il n'y a pas de fichiers associés à ce document. |
|||
Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que open access