Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndolfi, Ferruccio
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-27T09:34:18Z
dc.date.available2025-11-27T09:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.submitted2024-12-20T12:27:22Z
dc.identifierONIX_20241220_9791221503197_28
dc.identifier2704-5919
dc.identifierhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96232
dc.identifier.urihttps://doab-dev.siscern.org/handle/20.500.12854/206198
dc.description.abstractThe paper is essentially based on two writings by Hannah Arendt: Marx and the tradition of Western political thought and Vita activa. In her confrontation with Marx, the author denounces the ambiguity of the glorification of labour and rejects the idea that absolute domination of necessity may well be lost. In the analysis of the different forms of operating Arendt persists in a characterization of work as a low level of existence because it pertains to the body, needs, the simple preservation of individual life. In this way the feeling of a mutual curlency of labour, work and action is lost. At the bottom of the labour society, Arendt finds marked attention to the happiness of the unhappy people, who would be at the origin of dangerous revolutionary excesses.
dc.languageItalian
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudi e saggi
dc.rightsopen access
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::N History and Archaeology::NH History::NHB General and world history
dc.subject.otherArendt
dc.subject.otherMarxism
dc.subject.otherlabour’s society
dc.subject.otherhappiness
dc.titleChapter Hannah Arendt: l’impossibile redenzione del lavoro
dc.typechapter
oapen.identifier.doi10.36253/979-12-215-0319-7.105
oapen.relation.isPublishedBy2ec4474d-93b1-4cfa-b313-9c6019b51b1a
oapen.relation.isbn9791221503197
oapen.pages6
oapen.place.publicationFlorence
dc.seriesnumber257
dc.abstractotherlanguageThe paper is essentially based on two writings by Hannah Arendt: Marx and the tradition of Western political thought and Vita activa. In her confrontation with Marx, the author denounces the ambiguity of the glorification of labour and rejects the idea that absolute domination of necessity may well be lost. In the analysis of the different forms of operating Arendt persists in a characterization of work as a low level of existence because it pertains to the body, needs, the simple preservation of individual life. In this way the feeling of a mutual curlency of labour, work and action is lost. At the bottom of the labour society, Arendt finds marked attention to the happiness of the unhappy people, who would be at the origin of dangerous revolutionary excesses.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

open access
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as open access